Geology 32, Ammonoid diversity and disparity track episodes of chaotic carbon cycling during the early Mesozoic. Hirose, Geochemical variations in Vanuatu Arc lavas: Geochronologists are aware that excess argon may accumulate on mineral surfaces and the surface argon would be removed before analysis. And quite a few other dates are often much, much farther off. Read Volcanics, Tasmania, Australia.
The biostrategraphic limits issue The issue about igneous bodies may need additional clarification. Science , Van Der Laan, R. Derivation of an A-type magma by fractionation of basaltic magma: Some of these are taken from John Woodmoreappe's article on the subject, but only when I have reason to believe the statements are also generally believed. My experience is that whenever I look into an evidence for evolution or now the reliability of radiometric dating on the geologic column, it blows up on me, too. Implications for the end-Permian environmental crisis.
Where Should Humanity Aim? The Open Atmospheric Science Journal, , 2, An Introduction 6th ed.. Betts , High-resolution aeromagnetic data over central Australia assist Grenville-era — Ma Rodinia reconstructions, Geophys.
Terrane Processes at the Margins of Gondwana. Special publication of the Geological Society, London, , Cook, Alexi et al. Bill, , Waking the Giant: How a changing climate triggers earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanoes , Oxford University Press. Evidence for catastrophic sea-level rise and ice-sheet collapse. The effect of warming on tropical forests: How tropical forests may respond to future climate change, University of California, Irvine. SeientificcAmericann , March, 3 , Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences Anderson K L, Bows A.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. Effects of CO2, continental distribution, topography and vegetation changes on the climate at the Middle Miocene: Irish Journal of Earth Sciences.
The timing and magnitude of the sea level jump preluding the 8. Geology , 38 , Self , Atmospheric and environmental effects of the — Laki eruption: A review and reassessment , J. Re-evaluation of the Hypothesis Based on New Data from — Research Management Solutions The Basel Earthquake: Philisophical Transactions of the Royal Society , A. Advances in Geophysics, Elsevier. Geophysical Research Letters 28 , Dunkley Jones and A. Icarus , Wang, Quing-Liang et al.
Earth Planets Space 52 , Rothwell low sea-level-emplacement of a very large late Pleistocene turbidite in the western Mediterranean sea. Triggered by Climate Change? Anomalies of methane in the atmosphere over the East Siberian Shelf: European Geosciences Union General Assembly Determination of the age of the Australia continent by single-grain zircon analysis of Mt Narryer metaquartzite.
Western Australia 5 Hydrogen sulphide poisoning of shallow seas following the end-Triassic extinction. Extinction trajectories of benthic organisms across the Triassic Jurassic boundary.
Ammonoid diversity and disparity track episodes of chaotic carbon cycling during the early Mesozoic. Geology 39, 99 Global correlation of the radiolarian faunal change across the Triassic Jurassic boundary. Recognising ocean acidification in deep time: An evaluation of the evidence for acidification across the Triassic Jurassic boundary. Sudden productivity collapse associated with the Triassic Jurassic boundary mass-extinction.
Science , Van de Schootbrugge, B. End-Triassic calcification crisis and blooms of organic-walled disaster species. The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. Palaeoenvironmental implications for the aftermath of the end-Triassic crisis. Rhaetian to Pliensbachian palynostratigraphy of the central part of the NW German Basin exemplified by the Eitzendorf 8 well. Courier Forschungs-Institut Senckenberg , 69 83 Palynologische Untersuchungen im oberen Keuper Nordwestdeutschlands.
Climate change driven black shale deposition during the end-Triassic in the western Tethys. The evolutionary inheritance of elemental stoichiometry in marine phytoplankton. Nature , Floral changes across the Triassic Jurassic boundary linked to flood basalt volcanism. Estimates of the amount and rate of sea-level change across the Rhaetian-Hettangian and Pliensbachian-Toarcian boundaries latest Triassic to early Jurassic.
Chlorobiaceae in Paleozoic seas revealed by biological markers, isotopes and geology. Isorenieratene derivatives in sediments: Possible controls on their distribution. Acta 65, Geologischen Gesellschaft , 51 98 Molecular and isotopic characterization of biomarkers in the Frick Swiss Jura sediments: A palaeoenvironmental reconstruction on the northern Tethys margin.
Nitrogen isotope and trace metal analyses from the Mingolsheim core Germany: Evidence for redox variations across the Triassic Jurassic boundary. Cycles 22, GB Nitrogen isotope record of a perturbed paleoecosystem in the aftermath of the end-Triassic crisis, Doniford section, SW England. Sedimentary nitrogen isotopic ratio as a recorder for surface ocean nitrate utilization.
Cycles 8, High diversity dinoflagellate cyst assemblages from the Late Triassic of southern England: New information on early dinoflagellate evolution and palaeogeography. Lethaia 39, Paleo-oxygenation in Tertiary epeiric seas: Evidence from dinoflagellate cysts. Availability of reduced nitrogen chemospecies in photic-zone waters as the ultimate cause for fossil prasinophyte prosperity.
Palaios 22, Multi-nutrient, multi-group model of present and future oceanic phytoplankton communities. Biogeosciences 3, The late Rhaetian transgression in southern Sweden: Regional and global recognition and relation to the Triassic Jurassic boundary. Late Triassic bonebeds as unique archives of major environmental change prior to the Triassic Jurassic mass extinction. Reconstruction of water column anoxia in the equatorial Atlantic during the Cenomanian Turonian oceanic anoxic event using biomarker and trace metal proxies.
Biogeochemical evidence for euxinic oceans and ecological disturbance presaging the end-Permian mass-extinction event. Photic Zone Euxinia during the Permian Triassic superanoxic event. Large igneous provinces and mass extinctions. Terrestrial and marine extinction at the Triassic Jurassic boundary synchronized with major carbon cycle perturbation: A link to initiation of massive volcanism. Geology 30, Extensive million-year-old continental flood basalts of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province.
Geology 32, Fossil plants and global warming at the Triassic Jurassic boundary. No causal link between terrestrial ecosystem change and methane release during the end-Triassic mass-extinction.
Geology 40, Ascent of dinosaurs linked to an iridium anomaly at the Triassic Jurassic boundary. Carbon cycle perturbation and stabilization in the wake of the Triassic Jurassic boundary mass-extinction event.
Triassic mass extinctions, poisoning of shallow seas after the end of the end-Triassic extinctions by hydrogen sulphide. Possible animal-body fossils in pre-Marinoan limestones from South Australia.
Maloof, and Paul F. Geology of the Arctic Ed. University of Toronto Press,Toronto. Sedimentology Review 1 Ed. Processes and Sediments Ed. Geological Survey of Denmark, Copenhagen. Meddelelser om Gr nland, 19, 50pp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Watt GreenlandGeological Survey, Copenhagen. The Caledonide Geology of Scandinavia Ed. Auckland Park, South Africa, pp. GoldschmidtConference Proceedings, Davos, A In Geology of the Arctic: Deglaciation, d13C excursions, and carbonate precipitation.
Programs, 19 7 , A Multidisciplinary Study Ed by J. Paleoceanography, 18 4 , The Caledonian Geology of Scandinavia Ed. Supercontinental assembly and breakup Ed. Gr nlands Geologiske Unders gelse, , 38pp. Scotland and East Greenland. Manuscript received 20 August ;Manuscript Accepted: References and Notes 1. See supporting material on Science Online. Press, Princeton, NJ, Singh, Nature , Luminescence dating at the archaeological and human burial site at Roonka, South Australia.
Herries, Bai Kanning, Paul S. Paleolatitudes of the Kerguelen hotspot: Double flood basalts and plume head separation at the kilometer discontinuity, Science, , Refined spreading history of the Southwest Indian Ridge for the last 96 Ma, with the aid of satellite data, Geophys.
Effect of finite extension rate on melt generation at rifted continental margins, J. Development of volcanic passive margins: Struture of the Cretaceous Kerguelen volcanic province southern Indian Ocean from wide-angle seismic data, J.
Subsidence of the Kerguelen Plateau: Schlich and et al. Kerguelen Hotspot magma output since Ma, J. On causal links between flood basalts and continental breakup, Earth Planet. Geological history of the Bengal Geosyncline, J. Seafloor spreading magnetic anomalies south of Sri Lanka, Marine Geol. Three-dimensional dynamical model of continental rift propagation and margin plateau formation, J. Continental breakup in magmatic provinces: Crustal structure, seismic stratigraphy and tectonic history of the Cosmonaut Sea sedimentary basin Antarctica, southern Indian Ocean , Exploration and Protection of Mineral Resources original in Russian , 9, 27— Kerguelen Plateau crustal structure and basin formation from seismic and gravity data, J.
The composite magnetic anomaly map of the East Antarctic, Tectonophysics, , — Effects of igneous activity in the offshore northern Perth Basin—evidence from petroleum exploration wells, 2D seismic and magnetic surveys, in Western Australian Basins Symposium III, pp. A Mesozoic timescale, J. The Aegir Rift—crustal structure of an extinct spreading axis, Marine Geophys. Gondwana events and palaeogeography: Archaean and Proterozoic high-grade terranes of East Antarctica 40—80 E ; a case study of diversity in granulite facies metamorphism, in High-Temperature Metamorphism and Crustal Anatexis, pp.
Deep structure of the U. Atlantic continental margin, offshore South Carolina, from coincident ocean bottom and multichannel seismic data, J. Centroid depths of mid-ocean ridge earthquakes; dependence on spreading rate, J.
Plume capture by divergent plate motions: Timing and geometry of early Gondwana breakup, J. Dayside geomagnetic Pc5 pulsations in the conditions of a strongly disturbed solar wind during the magnetic storm of 21 February , Int.
Fossil hot spot-ridge interaction in the Musicians Seamount Province: Seafloor spreading in the Weddell Sea from magnetic and gravity data, Tectonophysics, , 43— The Pan-African event in East Antarctica: Denudational and thermal history along a transect across the Lambert Graben, northern Prince Charles Mountains, Antarctica, derived from apatite fission track thermochronology, Tectonics, 22, doi: Autopsy on a dead spreading center: Evolution of the Australian- Antarctic discordance since Miocene time, J.
The relative behavior of shear velocity, bulk sound speed, and compressional velocity in the mantle: Breakup and Mesozoic seafloor spreading between the Australian and Indian plates, Ph.
Special Issue, 43, 48— Seismological imaging of the Antarctic continental lithosphere: Revised plate motions relative to hotspots for combined Atlantic and Indian Ocean hotspot tracks, Geology, 16, — Digital isochrons of the worlds ocean floor, J.
A recipe for microcontinent formation, Geology, 29, — Contrasting rifted margin styles south of Greenland: Magnetic anomaly lineations and fracture zones deduced from vector magnetic anomalies in theWest Enderby Basin, in Weddell Sea Tectonics and Gondwana Breakup, pp.
Geodynamic implications of moving Indian Ocean hotspots, Earth Planet. Extinct spreading centre in the Labrador Sea: An analysis of the variation of ocean floor bathymetry and heat flow with age, J. Reconstruction of the Central Indian Ocean, Tectonophysics, , — Pre-breakup continental extension in East Gondwanaland and the early opening of the eastern Indian Ocean, Tectonophysics, , — Mesozoic anomalies in the Bay of Bengal, Earth Planet. Magnetic studies in the northern Bay of Bengal, Marine Geophys.
Ocean spreading rate and crustal thickness, Marine Geophys. The Kerguelen Province revisited: Jurassic to Eocence plate tectonic reconstructions in the Kerguelen Plateau region, Proc. Retracking ERS-1 altimeter waveforms for optimal gravity field recovery, Geophys. Ridge segmentation and magnetic structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge at 50 degrees 30E, 55 degrees 30E and 66 degrees 20E: Evidence for asymmetric nonvolcanic rifting and slow incipient oceanic accretion from seismic refection data of the Newfoundland margin, J.
Cambrian orogenic belt in East Antarctica and Sri Lanka: Global sea floor topography from satellite altimetry and ship depth soundings, Science, , — A deep seismic reflection reflection profile across the extinct mid-Labrador Sea spreading centre, Tectonics, 14, — Extent of the oceanic crust in the Labrador Sea, Mar. The deep-water East Antarctic continental margin, from 38—E: The Mediterranean Region from Crust to Mantle, pp.
Inferences regarding initiation of oceanic crust formation from the U. The oldest magnetic anomalies in the Australian-Antarctic Basin: Free software helps map and display data, EOS Trans. Magmatism at rift zones: Magmatism during and after continental breakup, inMagmatism and the Causes of Continental Breakup, pp. Mantle plumes and flood basalts, J. Mode of crustal extension determined by rheological layering, Earth Planet. Geochronologic constraints of granulite terranes of South India and their implications for the Precambrian assembly of Gondwana, J.
Southeast Asian Earth Sci. Geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic mapping of source provinces for the Mawson charnockites, east Antarctica: The timing and duration of the Delamerian orogeny: Correlation with the Ross Orogen and implications for Gondwana assembly.
Foden, J, Elburg, M. Journal of Geology , 2 , — The tectonic significance of Cambrian allochthonous mafic-ultramafic complexes in Tasmania. Terminal suturing of Gondwana and the onset of the Ross-Delamerian Orogeny: Early Palaeozoic tectonism within East Antarctic craton: Palaeogeographic and tectonic development of the Lachlan Fold Belt, southeastern Australia. Structure and age of the northern Leeuwin Complex, Western Australia. A radiometric estimate of the duration of sedimentation in the Adelaide Geosyncline, South Australia.
The regional tectonics of the Tasman orogenic system, eastern Australia. Ion-probe zircon dating of amid-Early Cambrian tuff in South Australia. Tectonic implications of Late Proterozoic—Early Palaeozoic igneous rock associations in western Tasmania. Pacific margins of Laurentia and East Antarctica-Australia as a conjugate rift pair: New analytical procedures to increase the resolution of zircon geochronology by the evaporation technique.
The geology of South Australia. Phase relationships in Buchan facies series pelitic assemblages: Age and metasomatic alteration of the Mt. Neill Granite at Nool J. Painter Inlier, South Australia. A newly defined Late Ordovician magmatic-thermal event in the Mt. Changing magmatic and tectonic styles along the paleo-Pacific margin of Gondwana and the onset of early Paleozoic magmatism in Antarctica.
Single grain dating of a granite sample from CapeWilloughby, Kangaroo Island. Ordovician turbidites of the Hotham Group, eastern Victoria: Grenville aged basement provinces in East Antarctica: Relationships between deformation and partial melting in the Palmer migmatites, South Australia. Early Palaeozoic foreland thrusting and basin reactivation at the palaeo-Pacific margin of the southeastern Australian Precambrian Craton: Geochemistry and geochronology of the Rathjen Gneiss: Geochemical evolution of lithospheric mantle beneath S.
Granite production in the Delamerian Orogen, South Australia. The tectonic implications of Delamerian magmatism in South Australia and western Victoria. Contrasting thermal evolution within the Ross Orogen, Antarctica: Neoproterozoic- Cambrian basement-involved orogenesis within the Antarctic margin of Gondwana.
Were aspects of Pan-African deformation linked to Iapetus opening? The Delamerian Orogeny and potential foreland sedimentation: Zircon zonation patterns as revealed by cathodoluminescence and backscattered electron images: Development of the Early Palaeozoic Pacific margin of Gondwana from detrital-zircon ages across the Delamerian Orogen. Continuation of the Mozambique Belt into east Antarctica: Grenville-age metamorphism and polyphase Pan-African high-grade events in central Dronning Maud Land.
Observations on the tectonic evolution of the southern Adelaide Fold Belt. Petrology and geochemistry of syn- to post-collisional metaluminous A-type granites: Plutonic boninite-like rocks in anatectic setting: Variability in flow and temperatures within mantle subduction zones.
A synopsis of events related to the assembly of eastern Gondwana. Mafic volcanic rocks on King Island, Tasmania: Early Palaeozoic rather than Neoproterozoic volcanism and rifting within the Transantarctic Mountains.
Pre- to syn-tectonic emplacement of early Palaeozoic granites in southeastern South Australia. The island arc setting of a New Zealand Cambrian volcano-sedimentary sequence: Cambrian arc evolution along the SE Gondwana active margin: Depositional history of pre- Devonian strata and timing of Ross orogenic tectonism in the central Transantarctic Mountains, Antarctica. Stratigraphic architecture and depositional setting of the coarse-grained Upper Cambrian Owen Conglomerate, West Coast range, western Tasmania.
A synthesis of folding and metamorphism in the Mt. Lofty Ranges, South Australia. Structural geometry and controls on basement-involved deformation in the northern Flinders Ranges, Adelaide Fold Belt, South Australia. Geochronology of the Mt. Read Volcanics, Tasmania, Australia. The Mozambique Belt in northern Mozambique: Neoproterozoic — Ma crustal growth and tectonogenesis, and superimposed Pan- African — Ma tectonism.
South Australian record of a Rodinian epicontinental basin and its mid-Neoproterozoic break-up Ma to form the Palaeo-Pacific ocean. Late Proterozoic stratigraphy, sedimentation, palaeontology and tectonics. Correlation between metamorphic events and Rb-Sr ages in metasediments and eclogite from western Tasmania.
Time dependence of negative buoyancy and the subduction of continental lithosphere. Evolution of the continental crust in the Proterozoic Eastern Ghats Belt, India and new constraints for Rodinia reconstruction: An active Neoproterozoic margin: Skelton Glacier area, Transantarctic Mountains. Granite genesis and the mechanics of convergent orogenic belts with application to the southern Adelaide Fold Belt.
Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two-stage model. The Ross Orogen of the Transantarctic Mountains. New York, Cambridge University Press, p. Proterozoic and Cambrian orogenies in Tasmania. Petrogenesis of late-Delamerian A-type granites and granophyre, South Australia: Derivation of an A-type magma by fractionation of basaltic magma: Source of the Lachlan fold belt flysch linked to convective removal of the lithospheric mantle and rapid exhumation of the Delamerian-Ross fold belt.
Vakarelov, and Simon C. Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid. Physical Review E, Topology of evolving networks: Physical Review Letters, 85 Synchronization in complex networks.
Physics Reports, 3: Physical Review Letters, 92 Physics Reports, 4—5: Detecting climate-induced patterns using wavelet analysis. Environmental Pollution, 83 The igraph software package for complex network research. Surface climate variations over the North Atlantic Ocean during winter: Journal of Climate, 6 9: The backbone of the climate network. Complex networks in climate dynamics — comparing linear and nonlinear network construction methods.
Eurpean Physical Journal — Special Topics, Centrality in social networks: Social Networks, 1 3: Interdecadal oscillations and the warming trend in global temperature time series. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 5 Nonlinear Time Series Analysis.
University Press, Cambridge, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 82 2: Physical Review Letters, Statistical Analysis in Climate Research. Cambridge University Press, Hierarchical organization unveiled by functional connectivity in complex brain networks. Physical Review Letters, 97 Change 1, Twitchett, The Lilliput effect in the aftermath of the end-Permian extinction event.
Morante, Global coal gap between Permian-Triassic extinction and Middle Triassic recovery of peat-forming plants. Worsley, Causes and consequences of extreme Permo-Triassic warming to globally equable climate and relation to the Permo-Triassic extinction and recovery.
Implications for the end-Permian environmental crisis. Gilmore, Conodont survival and low iridium abundances across the Permian-Triassic boundary in South China. Information on materials and methods is available on Science Online. Bjorkman, Photosynthetic response and adaptation to temperature in higher plants.
Somero, Proteins and temperature. Systemic to molecular hierarchy of thermal tolerance in animals. Oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance in animals. Naturwissenschaften 88, Twitchett, Extent, duration, and nature of the Permian-Triassic superanoxic event. A matrix for integrating climate-related stressor effects in marine ecosystems. Smith, A review of the Triassic vertebrate faunas of Svalbard. Newton, The Permo-Triassic transition in Spitsbergen: Fischer, Paleophysiology and end-Permian mass extinction.
Lucas, Global Triassic tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology. Press, New York, Evidence for global climatic change in the wake of the end-Permian biotic crisis.
Geology 35, Visscher, The delayed resurgence of equatorial forests after the Permian-Triassic ecologic crisis. Knust, Climate change affects marine fishes through the oxygen limitation of thermal tolerance. Science , 95 Bickford, Shrinking body size as an ecological response to climate change.
Twitchett, Palaeoenvironments and faunal recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction. Peck, Polar gigantism dictated by oxygen availability. Stanley, Evidence from ammonoids and conodonts for multiple Early Triassic mass extinctions.
Orchard, Conodont diversity and evolution through the latest Permian and Early Triassic upheavals. Chen, in Mass Extinction and Recovery: Stanley, Relation of Phanerozoic stable isotope excursions to climate, bacterial metabolism, and major extinctions.
Krull, Landscape ecological shift at the Permian—Triassic boundary in Antarctica. Peacock, An ecological explanation for the Permo-Triassic carbon and sulfur isotope shifts. Cycles 13, Huber, A hotter greenhouse? Press, New York, , pp. Geoarabia 14, 17 Implications for oceanic conditions associated with the end-Permian extinction and its aftermath. Palaios 18, Geology 39, Shen, in Mass Extinction and Recovery: Erwin, Gastropod diversity patterns in South China during the Chihsia - Ladinian and their mass extinction.
Palaeoworld 4, Geodiversitas 31, Albertiana 33, Taylor, in The Global Triassic, S. Insights from carbonate carbon isotopes, sedimentary evolution and ammonoid paleobiogeography. Chen, Early Triassic carbon isotope excursions from South China: Proxies for devastation and restoration of marine ecosystems following the end-Permian mass extinction. Change 55, 39 Insights from oxygen isotopes in apatite. Colman, Oxygen isotope analysis of phosphates: A comparison of techniques for analysis of Ag3PO4.
Courtillot, Paleomagnetic constraints on the geodynamic history of the major blocks of China from the Permian to the present. Zhong, Triassic conodont biostratigraphy in different sedimental environments in eastern Yunnan, western Guizhou and northern Guangxi. Stratigraphy 14, 15 Jiang, Palaeoenvironmental and palaeogeographic significance of the Triassic conodonts. Boyer, World Ocean Atlas , Volume 4: Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg , Facies 38, Martineau, Thermal excursions in the ocean at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary northern Morocco: Powell, Late Paleozoic glacial episodes in Gondwanaland reflected in transgressive-regressive depositional sequences in Euramerica.
A record of alternating glacial and nonglacial climate regime. London , Beerling, CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate. GSA Today 14, 4 Bottjer, Unique microgastropod biofacies in the Early Triassic: Indicator of long-term biotic stress and the pattern of biotic 31 recovery after the end-Permian mass extinction.
Monatshefte 5, Zhai, Early Triassic fishes from Jurong, Jiangsu. Li, A new Triassic perleidid fish from Hubei, China. China 29, 26 Jin, An overview of Triassic fishes from China. Li, Studies of the Triassic marine reptiles of China: Huang, The horizon and age of the marine reptiles from Hubei Province, China. China 15, Renne, Age and timing of the Permian mass extinctions: Geochronologic and biostratigraphic constraints from south China.
Geology 34, Lucas, Global Permian tetrapod biostratigraphy and biochronology. Geological Society London Special Publications , 65 Heckert, Biochronological significance of Triassic nonmarine tetrapod records from marine strata. Albertiana 24, 30 Bendix-Almgreen, in Geology of Greenland, A. Dunbar, Permian brachiopod faunas of central east Greenland. Goto, Palaeozoic and early Mesozoic fish faunas of the Japanese Islands.
Arc 3, Waagen, Fossils from the Ceratite Formation, vol. Carroll, Plesiosaur ancestors from the Upper Permian of Madagascar. B , Past and present views. Neuman, An enigmatic chondrichthyan with Paleozoic affinities from the Lower Triassic of western Canada. Evans, A new cestraciont spine from the Lower Triassic of Idaho.
Hallam, Griesbachian Earliest Triassic palaeoenvironmental changes in the Salt Range, Pakistan and southeast China and their bearing on the Permo-Triassic mass extinction. Dutuit, in Gondwana Six: Alcheringa 33, Barrett, New reptile material from the Lower Triassic of Madagascar: Implications for the Permian-Triassic extinction event. Lambe, Ganoid fishes from near Banff, Alberta. Brinkmann, A new specimen of the hybodont shark Palaeobates polaris with three-dimensionally preserved Meckel's cartilage from the Smithian Early Triassic of Spitsbergen.
Tailleur, Geology of the Killik-Itkillik region, Alaska. Klets, in The Global Triassic, S. Palaeontology 35, Arkiv foer Mineralogi och Geologi 2, India 47, Motani, First complete forefin of the ichthyosaur Grippia Longirostris from the Triassic of Spitsbergen. Palaeontology 41, Ando, Ichthyosaurian relationships illuminated by new primitive skeletons from Japan. Hachiya, On the hybodont elasmobranch teeth of three genera from the Mesozoic of Japan.
Japan 97, Systematics and Fossil Record, G. Wachtler, in Mesozoic Fishes 3: Systematics, Paleoenvironments, and Biodiversity, G. Rauff, Revision der Fauna der Wirbellosen der oberschlesischen Trias. Bucher, in Mesozoic Fishes: Systematics and Paleoecology, G. Brinkman, New Thalattosaurs Reptilia: Ichthyosauria from the Middle Triassic of Spitsbergen: Filling a paleobiogeographic gap.
Ochev, Novye nakhodki ikhtiozarvov v triase severo-vostoka SSSR i nekotorye zamechaniya ob usloviyakh ikh zakhoroneniya. Razvedka 15, 36 Exceptional preservation, and new evidence on the Triassic recovery from end-Permian mass extinction. Sander, The Pachypleurosaurids Reptilia: Nothosauria from the middle triassic of Monte San Giorgio Switzerland with the description of a new species. Galobart, New insights on the Permian and Triassic vertebrates from the Iberian Peninsula with emphasis on the Pyrenean and Catalonian basins.
Matzke, The skull of a large Lower Triassic ichthyosaur from Spitzbergen and its implications for the origin of the Ichthyosauria. Lethaia 35, Bucher, New marine vertebrate fauna from the Middle Triassic of Nevada. Huene, Ichthyosaurierreste aus Timor. Rieppel, A new species of Tanystropheus Reptilia: Solar or Tidal Signature?
Climatic Change 13, no. Petrology 53 , — Mines and Energy, Adelaide. Sciences 15 , — A Proxy for Solar Cyclicity? Earth Sciences 32 , — Kirschvink, in The Proterozoic Biosphere, J. Press, Cambridge, , pp. Schrag, Science , Halverson, in Neoproterozoic Geobiology and Paleobiology, S. Springer, New York, , pp. Crowley, Geology 32, Han, Terra Nova 20, Schrag, Geology 38, Jones, thesis, Harvard University Acta 70, Link, Geology 32, Meert, Nature , We thank the Yukon Geological Survey for assistance with logistics and helicopter support, T.
Petersen for assistance in the field, and D. Yntema for preparing samples. Evidence of recent causal decoupling between solar radiation and global temperature. Layne, Partitioning of elements between peridotite and H2O at 2. Isacks, On the strength of interplate coupling and the rate of back arc convergence in the central Andes: Or it could be that such a distribution of argon pressures in the rocks occurred at some time in the past.
This would also make deeper rocks tend to have older radiometric ages. Recent lava flows often yield K-Ar ages of about , years. This shows that they contain some excess argon, and not all of it is escaping. If they contained a hundred times more excess argon, their K-Ar ages would be a hundred times greater, I suppose. And faster cooling could increase the ages by further large factors.
I also read of a case where a rock was K-Ar dated at 50 million years, and still susceptible to absorbing argon from the air.
This shows that one might get radiometric ages of at least 50 million years in this way by absorbing Ar40 deep in the earth without much Ar36 or Ar38 present. If the pressure of Ar40 were greater, one could obtain even greater ages. Yet another mechanism that can lead to decreasing K-Ar ages with time is the following, in a flood model: One can assume that at the beginning of the flood, many volcanoes erupted and the waters became enriched in Ar Then any lava under water would appear older because its enclosed Ar40 would have more trouble escaping.
As time passed, this Ar40 would gradually pass into the atmosphere, reducing this effect and making rocks appear younger. In addition, this would cause a gradient of Ar40 concentrations in the air, with higher concentrations near the ground.
This also could make flows on the land appear older than they are, since their Ar40 would also have a harder time escaping. Plaisted wants to give his readers the impression that argon can readily move in and out of minerals and, therefore, the gas is too volatile for radiometric dating. Specifically, he quotes one of his anonymous friends that claims that argon easily diffuses from minerals p. Of course, these statements are inaccurate generalizations. Geochronologists are aware that excess argon may accumulate on mineral surfaces and the surface argon would be removed before analysis.
However, Henke admits that this can happen in some cases. He states that geologists are aware of this problem, and make allowances for it. But it is more difficult to remove argon that has deposited on cracks in the mineral, which can be difficult to see.
Henke referenced Davis A. Young frequently, but I was not able to find Young referenced in any of the other sources I examined except Dalrymple Henke states that hornblendes retain argon very well, but then later says that they can easily absorb excess argon. Geologists also recognize that heating causes argon to leave minerals, and that dissolved argon in a mineral that does not escape will become incorporated into it, artificially increasing its K-Ar age. I will comment more on this below, but a few comments now are appropriate.
For a temperature of K 27 degrees C , there is no significant argon loss from biotite. At K degrees C , there is a slow but significant diffusion rate. At K degrees C , loss of argon is quite rapid. To lose one percent in one year requires a temperature of nearly degrees centigrade. Thus the temperature does not have to be very high for argon to move through rock.
This also justifies Slusher's statements about argon moving in and out of rocks with ease. However, it does not seem likely that sedimentary rocks would be this hot very often, except near lava or magma flows. But argon does not need to move through all rock in order to influence radiometric dates, it only has to reach ancient lava flows.
This it can do by following the path of the ancient lava flow itself, coming up along the path of the magma. As the magma or lava cools, this path will consist entirely of hot magma or lava, and so the argon will have a free path, and will continue to enter the magma as it cools.
Thus in many cases, the lava or magma will never completely degas, and extra argon will end up trapped in the cooled rock. This will result in artificially increased K-Ar ages. Many ancient lava flows are relatively flat, in contrast to modern ones. Also, they appear to have been covered over quickly.
The flatness means that the lava is a contiguous mass, and can still be reached from the hot magma by a continuous path of hot rock.
The fact that they soon are covered over means that the argon has a hard time escaping vertically from the lava, so argon coming up from the mantle will tend to enter the cooling rock. Both facts will tend to produce artificially high K-Ar ages in these flows which will not be seen in modern lava flows in the same manner.
Modern lava flows often come down the sides of volcanoes, and thus become separated from their source by large distances. Also, they do not get quickly buried by additional sediment. Thus modern lava flows are not subject to the same mechanism of artificial increases in their K-Ar ages as are ancient ones.
Also, it is reasonable to assume that as argon leaves the mantle in successive eruptions, the amount of argon remaining is reduced, so that later lava flows are less susceptible to such artificial increases in age. The path of magma also becomes longer for later flows, and the magma probably also is a little cooler, inhibiting argon flow.
Thus later lava flows give younger K-Ar ages. Another point to note is that even after it cools, the lava or magma may still have many cracks in it, permitting argon to flow. This argon will tend to deposit on the surface of minerals, but with the passage of time it will tend to diffuse into the interior, even if only a very small distance. This is especially true as the lava is cooling. This will make it more difficult to detect this added argon by the spectrum test described below.
Also, the diffusion of argon in cracks and channels of a mineral is likely much less temperature-dependent than diffusion through unbroken regions of the mineral, since diffusion through cracks and channels simply involves jumps through the air.
By a combination of diffusion through cracks and channels, and short passages through unbroken regions of the mineral, argon may be able to reach a considerable distance into the mineral. At low temperatures, this may become the dominant means by which argon diffuses into a mineral, but the effect of this kind of diffusion at low temperatures may not be evident until many years have passed.
Thus it may take experiments lasting 50 or years at low temperatures to detect the effects of this kind of diffusion of argon, which however could be significantly increasing the K-Ar ages of minerals over long time periods. Dickin Radiogenic Isotope Geology, , p. It has been claimed that this can be accomplished by preheating samples under vacuum or by leaching them briefly with hydroflouric acid, or both However Armstrong has questioned whether atmospheric argon, that has been acquired by minerals over a long interval of time, can be removed by this method.
Thus there is some means by which argon from outside can become very firmly embedded within a rock, and one would expect that the quantity of this argon would continue to increase over time, giving anomalously old K-Ar ages. Added atmospheric argon can be detected, because the ratio of argon 40 to argon 36 for atmospheric argon is But argon 40 coming up from the mantle and diffusing into a mineral would not be detectable in this way, because it has a higher ratio of argon 40 to argon This shows that rocks can adsorb a large amount of argon relative to the argon needed to give them old K-Ar ages, and also suggests that old K-Ar ages can be produced by external argon from the mantle.
Over a long period of time, adsorbed argon will tend to diffuse into the rock, and thus it will be possible for even more argon to be deposited on the surface, increasing K-Ar ages even more. Generally, excess 40Ar is observed in minerals that have been exposed to a high partial pressure of argon during regional metamorphism, in pegmatites The argon that may either diffuse into the minerals or may be occluded within them is derived by outgassing of K-bearing minerals in the crust and mantle of the Earth.
The presence of excess 40Ar increases K-Ar dates and may lead to overestimates of the ages of minerals dated by this method. Let us consider the question of how much different dating methods agree on the geologic column, and how many measurements are anomalous, since these points are often mentioned as evidences of the reliability of radiometric dating.
It takes a long time to penetrate the confusion and find out what is the hard evidence in this area. In the first place, I am not primarily concerned with dating meteorites, or precambrian rocks. What I am more interested in is the fossil-bearing geologic column of Cambrian and later age. Now, several factors need to be considered when evaluating how often methods give expected ages on the geologic column. Some of these are taken from John Woodmoreappe's article on the subject, but only when I have reason to believe the statements are also generally believed.
First, many igneous formations span many periods, and so have little constraint on what period they could belong to. The same applies to intrusions. In addition, some kinds of rocks are not considered as suitable for radiometric dating, so these are typically not considered. Furthermore, it is at least possible that anomalies are under-reported in the literature. Finally, the overwhelming majority of measurements on the fossil bearing geologic column are all done using one method, the K-Ar method.
And let me recall that both potassium and argon are water soluble, and argon is mobile in rock. Thus the agreement found between many dates does not necessarily reflect an agreement between different methods, but rather the agreement of the K-Ar method with itself. For example, if 80 percent of the measurements were done using K-Ar dating, and the other 20 percent gave random results, we still might be able to say that most of the measurements on a given strata agree with one another reasonably well.
So to me it seems quite conceivable that there is no correlation at all between the results of different methods on the geologic column, and that they have a purely random relationship to each other. Let us consider again the claim that radiometric dates for a given geologic period agree with each other.
I would like to know what is the exact or approximate information content of this assertion, and whether it could be or has been tested statistically. It's not as easy as it might sound. Let's suppose that we have geologic periods G Let's only include rocks whose membership in the geologic period can be discerned independent of radiometric dating methods. Let's also only include rocks which are considered datable by at least one method, since some rocks I believe limestone are considered not to hold argon, for example.
Now, we can take a random rock from Gi. We will have to restrict ourselves to places where Gi is exposed, to avoid having to dig deep within the earth. Let's apply all known dating methods to Gi that are thought to apply to this kind of rock, and obtain ages from each one. Then we can average them to get an average age for this rock.
We can also compute how much they differ from one another. Now we have to be careful about lava flows -- which geologic period do they belong to? What about rocks that are thought not to have their clock reset, or to have undergone later heating episodes? Just to make the test unbiased, we will assign altitude limits to each geologic period at each point on the earth's surface at least in principle and include all rocks within these altitude limits within Gi, subject to the condition that they are datable.
For each geologic period and each dating method, we will get a distribution of values. We will also get a distribution of averaged values for samples in each period. Now, some claim is being made about these distributions.
It is undoubtedly being claimed that the mean values ascend as one goes up the geologic column. It is also being claimed that the standard deviations are not too large.
It is also being claimed that the different methods have distributions that are similar to one another on a given geologic period. The only correlation I know about that has been studied is between K-Ar and Rb-Sr dating on precambrian rock. And even for this one, the results were not very good.
This was a reference by Hurley and Rand, cited in Woodmorappe's paper. As far as I know, no study has been done to determine how different methods correlate on the geologic column excluding precambrian rock. The reason for my request is that a correlation is not implied by the fact that there are only 10 percent anomalies, or whatever.
I showed that the fact that the great majority of dates come from one method K-Ar and the fact that many igneous bodies have very wide biostratigraphic limits, where many dates are acceptable, makes the percentage of anomalies irrelevant to the question I am asking. And since this agreement is the strongest argument for the reliability of radiometric dating, such an assumption of agreement appears to be without support so far. The question of whether different methods correlate on the geologic column is not an easy one to answer for additional reasons.
Since the bulk of K-Ar dates are generally accepted as correct, one may say that certain minerals are reliable if they tend to give similar dates, and unreliable otherwise. We can also say that certain formations tend to give reliable dates and others do not, depending on whether the dates agree with K-Ar dates. Thus we can get an apparent correlation of different methods without much of a real correlation in nature.
It's also possible for other matter to be incorporated into lava as it rises, without being thoroughly melted, and this matter may inherit all of its old correlated radiometric dates. Coffin mentions that fission tracks can survive transport through lava, for example.
It may also be that lava is produced by melting the bottom of continents and successively different layers are melted with time, or there could be a tendency for lighter isotopes to come to the top of magma chambers, making the lava there appear older.
But anyway, I think it is important really to know what patterns appear in the data to try to understand if there is a correlation and what could be causing it. Not knowing if anomalies are always published makes this harder. It is often mentioned that different methods agree on the K-T boundary, dated at about 65 million years ago. This is when the dinosaurs are assumed to have become extinct. This agreement of different methods is taken as evidence for a correlation between methods on the geologic column.
One study found some correlated dates from bentonite that are used to estimate the date of the K-T boundary. I looked up some information on bentonite. It is composed of little glass beads that come from volcanic ash. This is formed when lava is sticky and bubbles of gas in it explode.
So these small particles of lava cool very fast. The rapid cooling might mean that any enclosed argon is retained, but if not, the fact that this cooling occurs near the volcano, with a lot of argon coming out, should guarantee that these beads would have excess argon. As the gas bubble explodes, its enclosed argon will be rushing outward along with these tiny bubbles as they cool. This will cause them to retain argon and appear too old.
In addition, the rapid cooling and the process of formation means that these beads would have Rb, Sr, U, and Pb concentrations the same as the lava they came from, since there is no chance for crystals to form with such rapid cooling.
So to assume that the K-Ar dates, Rb-Sr dates, and U-Pb dates all reflect the age of the lava, one would have to assume that this lava had no Sr, no Pb, and that all the argon escaped when the beads formed.
Since the magma generally has old radiometric ages, I don't see how we could have magma without Pb or Sr. So to me it seems to be certain that these ages must be in error. Furthermore, the question arises whether bentonite always gives correlated ages, and whether these ages always agree with the accepted ages for their geologic period.
I believe that bentonite occurs in a number of formations of different geologic periods, so this could be checked. If bentonite does not always give correlate and correct ages, this calls into question its use for dating the K-T boundary. Let me briefly comment on a couple of other articles at Tim Thompson's page. This is at least close to what I am looking for. However, it would be better to date all five craters by all four different methods, and see what the agreement is.
It is also possible that each crater gives a scatter of dates, and the best ones were selected. Furthermore, it is possible that the craters were chosen as those for which the dating methods agreed.
Possible other sources of correlation Note that if there are small pockets in crystals where both parent and daughter product can accumulate from the lava, then one can inherit correlated ages from the lava into minerals. Thus even the existence of correlations is not conclusive evidence that a date is correct. Anomalies of radiometric dating If a date does not agree with the expected age of its geologic period, and no plausible explanation can be found, then the date is called anomalous.
But if we really understand what is going on, then we should be able to detect discrepant dates as they are being measured, and not just due to their divergence from other dates. Geologists often say that the percentage of anomalies is low. But there are quite a number of rather outstanding anomalies in radiometric dating that creationists have collected.
These anomalies are reported in the scientific literature. For example, one isochron yielded a date of 10 billion years. A Rb-Sr isochron yielded a date of 34 billion years.
K-Ar dates of 7 to 15 billion years have been recorded. It's also not uncommon for two methods to agree and for the date to be discarded anyway. Samples with flat plateaus which should mean no added argon can give wrong dates. Samples giving no evidence of being disturbed can give wrong dates.
Samples that give evidence of being disturbed can give correct dates. The number of dates that disagree with the expected ages is not insignificant. I don't know what the exact percentage is. Many dates give values near the accepted ones. But even these often differ from one another by 10 or 20 percent. And quite a few other dates are often much, much farther off. Whatever is making some of these dates inaccurate could be making all of them inaccurate.
Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different sometimes by hundreds of millions of years. There is not absolutely reliable long-term radiological "clock". The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologists and evolutionists As proof of the unreliability of the radiometric methods consider the fact that in nearly every case dates from recent lava flows have come back excessively large.
One example is the rocks from the Kaupelehu Flow, Hualalai Volcano in Hawaii which was known to have erupted in These rocks were dated by a variety of different methods. Of 12 dates reported the youngest was million years and the oldest was 2. The dates average 1.
Another source said that about 5 or 6 of the historic lava flows give ages in the hundreds of thousands of years.
Geologists explain the Kaupelehu date by the lava being cooled rapidly in deep ocean water and not being able to get rid of its enclosed argon. Instead, the uncertainty grows as more and more data is accumulated Woodmorappe also mentions that very self-contradictory age spreads in the Precambrian era are common.
In addition, Woodmorappe gives over sets of dates "that are in gross conflict with one another and with expected values for their indicated paleontological positions. This does not include dates from minerals that are thought to yield bad dates, or from igneous bodies with wide biostrategraphic ranges, where many dates are acceptable. He states that the number of dates within range are less than the number of anomalies, except for the Cenozoic and Cretaceous.
When one adds in the fact that many anomalies are unreported, which he gives evidence for, the true distribution is anyone's guess. There have been criticisms of John Woodmorappe's study, but no one has given any figures from the literature for the true percentage of anomalies, with a definition of an anomaly, or the degree of correlation between methods.
Steven Schimmrich's review of this study often concerns itself with John W's presentation of geologists explanation for anomalies, and not with the percentage of anomalies; the later is my main concern.
The carbon age of the buried trees is only years, but some of the overlying volcanic material has a ,year potassium-argon age. A similar situation is reported in the December issue of Creation ex nihilo in which lava with a K-Ar age of about 45 million years overlays wood that was carbon dated by 3 laboratories using AMS dating to about 35, years. Still another evidence for problems with radiometric dating was given in a recent talk I attended by a man who had been an evolutionist and taken a course in radiometric dating.
The teacher gave 14 assumptions of radiometric dating and said something like "If creationists got a hold of these, they could cut radiometric dating to pieces. Another evidence that all is not well with radiometric dating is given in the following quote from Coffin p. Many sedimentary uranium ores are not. Since equilibrium should be reached in 1 million years, this is a problem for sediments that are assumed to be older than 1 million years.
On another point, if we can detect minerals that were not molten with the lava, as has been claimed, then this is one more reason why there should be no anomalies, and radiometric dating should be a completely solved problem. But that does not appear to be the case, at least especially on the geologic column. I'm not claiming that anomalous results are being hidden, just that the agreement of a mass of results, none of which has much claim to reliability, does not necessarily mean much.
Picking out a few cases where radiometric dates appear to be well-behaved reminds me of evolutionary biologists focusing on a few cases where there may be transitional sequences. It does not answer the overall question. And as I said above, I'm also interested to know how much of the fossil-bearing geologic column can be dated by isochrons, and how the dates so obtained compare to others.
Gerling et al called attention to some chlorites yielding K-Ar dates of 7 to 15 b. It had been noted that some minerals which yield such dates as beryl, cordierite, etc. They also pointed out that for the anomalies to be accounted for by excess argon, unreasonably high partial pressures of Ar during crystallization would have to be required.
They concluded by suggesting some unknown nuclear process which no longer operates to have generated the Ar. This implies that excess argon is coming from somewhere. Here is another quote from Woodmorappe about isochrons, since some people think that mixing scenarios or other age-altering scenarios are unlikely:.
If this condition does not hold, invalid ages and intercepts are obtained. Models yield isochron ages that are too high, too low, or in the future, sometimes by orders of magnitude. The fact that the only "valid" K-Ar isochrons are those for which the concentration of non-radiogenic argon Ar36 is constant, seems very unusual.
This suggests that what is occuring is some kind of a mixing phenomenon, and not an isochron reflecting a true age. We have analyzed several devitrified glasses of known age, and all have yielded ages that are too young. Some gave virtually zero ages, although the geologic evidence suggested that devitrification took place shortly after the formation of a deposit. Why a low anomaly percentage is meaningless One of the main arguments in favor of radiometric dating is that so many dates agree with each other, that is, with the date expected for their geologic period.
But it's not evident how much support this gives to radiometric dating. If a rock dates too old, one can say that the clock did not get reset. If it dates too young, one can invoke a later heating event. Neither date would necessarily be seen as anomalous. If lava intrudes upon geologic period X, then any date for the lava of X or later will not be seen as anomalous. And even if the date is one or two geologic periods earlier, it may well be close enough to be accepted as non-spurious. If one does not know the geologic period of a rock by other means, then of course one is likely to date it to find out, and then of course the date agrees with the geologic period and this will not be seen as anomalous.
So it is difficult to know what would be a reasonable test for whether radiometric dating is reliable or not. The percentage of published dates that are considered as anomalous has little bearing on the question. The biostrategraphic limits issue The issue about igneous bodies may need additional clarification.
If a lava flow lies above geologic period A and below B, then allowable ages are anything at least as large as A and no larger than B. This is called the biostratigraphic limit of the flow. Now, according to Woodmorappe's citations, many lava flows have no such limits at all, and most of them have large limits.
For example, a flow lying on precambrian rock with nothing on top would have no limits on its dates. And such flows often have a large internal scatter of dates, but these dates are not considered as anomalies because of the unrestricted biostratigraphic limit. Other flows with wide biostratigraphic limits have weak restrictions on allowable dates. This is one reason why just reporting the percentage of anomalies has little meaning.
Thus these ages, though they generally have a considerable scatter, are not considered as anomalies. He cites another reference that most igneous bodies have wide biostrategraphic limits.
Thus just by chance, many dates will be considered within the acceptable ranges. Again, the percentage of anomalies means nothing for the reliability of radiometric dating. Now, igneous bodies can be of two types, extrusive and intrusive. Extrusive bodies are lava that is deposited on the surface. These cool quickly and have small crystals and form basalt. Intrusive bodies are deposited in the spaces between other rocks.
These cool more slowly and have larger crystals, often forming granite. Both of these tend on the average to have wide biostrategraphic limits, meaning that a large spread of ages will be regarded as non-anomalous. And if we recall that most radiometric dating is done of igneous bodies, one sees that the percentage of anomalies is meaningless.
Thus we really need some evidence that the different methods agree with each other. To make the case even stronger, "Many discrepant results from intrusives are rationalized away immediately by accepting the dates but reinterpreting the biostrategraphic bracket," according to John Woodmorappe.
This of course means that the result is no longer anomalous, because the geologic period has been modified to fit the date. Finally, the fact that the great majority of dates are from one method means that the general but not universal agreement of K-Ar dating with itself is sufficient to explain the small percentange of anomalies if it is small. Preponderance of K-Ar dating Now, the point about agreement is that whatever figure is given about how often ages agree with the expected age, is consistent with the fact that there is no agreement at all between K-Ar and other methods, since so many measurements are done using K-Ar dating.
And one of the strongest arguments for the validity of radiometric dating is that the methods agree. So when one combines all of the above figures, the statement that there are only 10 percent anomalies or 5 percent or whatever, does not have any meaning any more.
This statement is made so often as evidence for the reliability of radiometric dating, that the simple evidence that it has no meaning, is astounding to me. I don't object to having some hard evidence that there are real agreements between different methods on the geologic column, if someone can provide it. The precambrian rock is less interesting because it could have a radiometric age older than life, but this is less likely for the rest of the geologic column.
It's not surprising that K-Ar dates often agree with the assumed dates of their geological periods, since the dates of the geological periods were largely inferred from K-Ar dating. By the way, Ar-Ar dating and K-Ar dating are essentially the same method, so between the two of them we obtain a large fraction of the dates being used. Before the discovery of radioactivity in the late nineteenth century, a geological time scale had been developed on the basis of estimates for the rates of geological processes such as erosion and sedimentation, with the assumption that these rates had always been essentially uniform.
On the basis of being unacceptably old, many geologists of the time rejected these early twentieth century determinations of rock age from the ratio of daughter to radioactive parent large. By , increased confidence in radioisotope dating techniques and the demands of evolution theory for vast amounts of time led to the establishment of an expanded geological time scale. The construction of this time scale was based on about radioisotope ages that were selected because of their agreement with the presumed fossil and geological sequences found in the rocks.
Igneous rocks are particularly suited to K-Ar dating. The crucial determiners are therefore volcanic extrusive igneous rocks that are interbedded with sediments, and intrusive igneous rocks that penetrate sediments. This verifies what I said about almost all of the dates used to define correct ages for geologic periods being K-Ar dates. Also, the uncertainty in the branching ratio of potassium decay might mean that there is a fudge factor in K-Ar ages of up to a third, and that the occasional agreements between K-Ar ages and other ages are open to question.
So the point is that there is now no reason to believe that radiometric dating is valid on the geologic column. I mentioned the presence of excess argon 40 in a sample as a problem leading to artificially old K-Ar dates. Henke states in a reply to me, concerning the problem of detecting excess argon,. It is possible that such isochrons are not often done. One cannot always use an isochron, since many minerals may have about the same K and Ar40 concentrations, and there may be some fractionation of argon among the minerals.
It's not clear to me if this three dimensional plot always works, and how often it is used. I was not able to find any mention of it in Faure or Dickin It is true that by using additional isotopes if they are sufficiently abundant and do not fractionate , one can often detect mixings of multiple sources. My point was that the usual mixing test can only detect two sources. But since these multiple mixing tests are more difficult and expensive, they may not be done very often.
One also has to know which isotopes to examine. I was suprised that Dalrymple said nothing about mixings invalidating isochrons. Dalrymple goes to great lengths to explain this away, but I think this figure is very telling, and find his explanations unconvincing. It is also remarkable that we have a test for mixing, which is commonly cited in support of the accuracy of radiometric dating, but when it gives contrary results, it is simply ignored.
It is a fundamental assumption of the mantle isochron model that neither isotope nor elemental ratios are perturbed during magma ascent through the crust.
However, it is now generally accepted that this assumption is not upheld with sufficient reliability to attribute age significance to erupted isochrons. Dickin suggests that mixings may contribute to such isochrons.
It seems reasonable, then, that mixings may be affecting all Rb-Sr isochrons in igneous rock. Your hypothetical example in "More Bad News for Radiometric Dating" is often hard to follow, but it is clearly invalid. This example is given to show that a mixing of three sources cannot be detected by the usual two sources test. It is not intended to be natural, but to demonstrate a mathematical fact. There is a lot of flexibility in the design of such examples, as I indicate, and it is reasonable to assume that some of these examples would be natural.
It's the responsibility of the geologist to show that such mixings have not occurred. To really understand what's going on you have to sample the recent works of many different authors. You have to follow arguments between experts on different issues and see where they go. Overall, the geologic time scale is in great shape. Yes, scientists are still making minor adjustments.
However, it's clear from Strahler , Dalrymple , etc. The problem with this approach is that it leaves ample room for the exercise of subjective judgment and evolutionary assumptions. Also, Dalrymple says essentially nothing about the phanerozoic, and thus gives little evidence of the accuracy of the conventional dating scheme on fossil-bearing rocks.
I treated this issue of percentage of anomalies in considerable detail in my original "Radiometric Dating Game" article. It is interesting that Woodmorappe gives a number of cases in which standard geological tests are ignored. For example, dates may be accepted even when there is evidence of weathering, and rejected when there is not.
There may be evidence of heating, but the date may be accepted, and there may be no such evidence, but a hypothetical heating event is assumed anyway. If geological tests are not being applied consistently, one wonders what value they have.
Let me clarify the problem with excess argon. It gives the diffusion equation for argon escaping from a rock as it cools. The rate of diffusion is proportional to the gradient of argon concentration, and increases rapidly with temperature.
Suppose the partial pressure of argon 40 in the environment is p. Suppose the partial pressure of argon 40 in lava or magma is initially at least p, as it cools. Then the partial pressure of argon 40 in the magma will never decrease below p; excess argon 40 will remain dissolved in the lava or magma as it cools.
This argon 40 will then be trapped within the resulting rocks and lead to artificially old K-Ar dates. Now, the problem with this is that this excess argon 40 will probably be deposited as single atoms of argon distributed evenly within the sample.
This makes it very difficult or even theoretically impossible to distinguish this excess argon 40 from argon generated by radioactive decay. This will make the sample appear artificially old right away.
Even if crystals exclude argon as they form, argon will rapidly diffuse into them as the lava cools, by the diffusion equation mentioned above. A similar problem can occur if the excess argon 40 dissolved within lava or magma is not able to escape, due to rapid cooling or subsequent deposits of sediment or other lava on top. It is possible that in some cases an isochron might be able to detect such initial argon 40, but this can only happen if the potassium concentration varies significantly within the sample.
It is not clear to me, also, how often such a test for initial argon 40 is performed. And of course, such isochrons can be falsified by mixings or other problems. There are spectrum tests for adsorbed argon involving Ar-Ar dating; basically, one can see whether the argon 40 is concentrated near the surface of the sample or near the interior.
The former would indicated adsorbed argon 40, which would not give a true age. However, this test would not indicate excess argon 40 present during cooling. It seems reasonable to me that this is a uniform problem with K-Ar dating. To me the geological evidence suggests catastrophic conditions and rapid formation of the sedimentary layers in the past. Thus the lava might have been covered before the excess argon was able to escape.
Or the lava might have cooled quickly, due to rainfall. It only needs to cool to about degrees centigrade or less to trap most of the argon, at least for biotite. As I mentioned before, one sometimes finds significant argon 40 in a rock and no potassium at all, as mentioned in Snelling's article. This shows that excess argon is entering these rocks by some means, and calls K-Ar dating into question.
Excess argon could even cause different minerals in a given formation to yield similar K-Ar ages, since they all might have similar concentrations of K, approximately equal to its abundance in the earth's crust, and similar concentrations of argon 40, due to the partial pressure of argon 40 being similar during cooling.
Even sedimentary minerals might have a similar K-Ar age for the same reason. Also, lava magma that cooled within the earth is likely to have artificially old K-Ar ages, since the enclosed excess argon 40 might have a more difficult time escaping. One sedimentary mineral of particular importance for K-Ar dating is glaucony. The following message from a talk. For example, Plaisted's "explanation" for the correlation of isotopic age with vertical position in the geologic column is essentially that excess argon would have existed in lavas in greater quantity early in the Flood, and decreased as it was outgassed over time.
Had Plaisted actually bothered to look at the data e. Glaucony did not come from a "magma chamber," so Plaisted's explanation cannot possibly cover the majority of ages on the younger parts of the column.
Of the or so "anomalous" dates in Woodmorappe , 94 Woodmorappe is clearly misusing illite and glauconite dates to simply pad his list. The fact that glauconies are unreliable is significant, since they provide such a large part of the dates for the mesozoic-cenozoic parts of the geological column.
Glauconies are formed in seawater from a variety of materials, and incorporate potassium from the seawater Faure, , p. The process of their formation gives a ready mechanism for their K-Ar ages, namely, the incorporation of argon 40 as well as potassium from the seawater.
We can assume that as a result of a global catastrophe, the oceans were highly enriched in argon 40 in the past, and that the concentration of argon 40 gradually decreased over time, due to its diffusion into the atmosphere and due to a smaller amount being released into the seawater. Therefore older glauconies would absorb more argon 40 from the seawater, resulting in old K-Ar dates for lower strata which become progressively younger for higher strata.
Another factor in this direction is that older glauconies have more time to absorb argon Some minerals contain argon 40 but no potassium, so this indicates excess argon 40, which in the presence of potassium leads to artificially old dates. Many historical volcanoes give K-Ar dates that are much too old, even if the reasons for this are understood.
Finally, I want to comment on the circumstances of the interchange with Dr. During most of our interchange, I was not aware that it would be published on talk.
Now it has been web-immortalized on a radiometric dating web page. I was not informed that this exchange had been posted there. In addition, the complete exchange was not posted, but only a portion of it.
I do thank Tim Thomson for the courteous and professional manner in which he has interacted with me, and that he has included the rest of my exchange with Dr. Excuses for anomalies Another issue is that sometimes the geologic periods of rocks are revised to agree with the ages computed.
This also makes data about percentages of anomalies less meaningful. It sometimes seems that reasons can always be found for bad dates, especially on the geologic column. If a rock gives a too old date, one says there is excess argon.
If it gives a too young date, one says that it was heated recently, or cannot hold its argon. How do we know that maybe all the rocks have excess argon? It looks like geologists are taking the "majority view" of K-Ar dating, but there is no necessary reason why the majority of rocks should give the right date. The relationship of a radioisotope age with real-time must be based on an interpretation. A discussion of rubidium-strontium ages in the Isotope Geoscience Section of the journal, Chemical Geology, specifically states that a radioisotope age determination "does not certainly define a valid age information for a geological system.
Any interpretation will reflect the interpreters presuppositions bias. Need for a double-blind test Concerning the need for a double blind test, it would seem that there are many places where human judgment could influence the distribution of measured radiometric dates.
It could increase the percentage of anomalies, if they were regarded as more interesting. It could decrease them, if they were regarded as flukes. Human judgment could determine whether points were collinear enough to form an isochron. It could determine whether a point can justifiably be tossed out and the remaining points used as an isochron. It could determine whether one should accept simple parent-to-daughter K-Ar ratios or whether some treatment needs to be applied first to get better ages.
It could influence whether a spectrum is considered as flat, whether a rock is considered to have undergone leaching or heating, whether a rock is porous or not, or whether a sample has been disturbed in some way.
Since one of the main reasons for accepting radiometric dates at least I keep hearing it is that they agree with each other, I think that geologists have an obligation to show that they do agree, specifically on the geologic column.
Since we do not know whether or how much human judgment is influencing radiometric dating, a double blind study is most reasonable. And it should not be restricted to just one or two well-behaved places, but should be as comprehensive as possible. Possible changes in the decay rate The following information was sent to me by e-mail:. Radiometric dating is predicated on the assumption that throughout the earth's history radioactive decay rates of the various elements have remained constant.
Is this a warranted assumption? Has every radioactive nuclide proceeded on a rigid course of decay at a constant rate? This has been challenged by studies involving Carbon C At the temperature or pressure, collisions with stray cosmic rays or the emanations of other atoms may cause changes other than those of normal disintegration. It seems very possible that spontaneous disintegration of radioactive elements are related to the action of cosmic rays and the rate of disintegration varying from century to century according to the intensity of the rays.
The evidence for a strongly increasing change in the cosmic ray influx is most favorable especially in light of the decay of the earth's magnetic field. Most geochronologists maintain that pleochroic haloes give evidence that decay constants have not changed. Crystals of biotite, for example, and other minerals in igneous or metamorphic rocks commonly enclose minute specks of minerals containing uranium or thorium.
The a- alpha particles emitted at high velocity by the disintegrating nuclides interact, because of their charge, with electrons of surrounding atoms which slow them down until they finally come to rest in the host material at a distance from their source that depends on their initial kinetic energy and the density and composition of the host.
Where they finally stop to produce lattice distortions and defects there generally occurs discoloring or darkening. Each of the 8 a-particles emitted during the disintegration of U to Pb produces a dark ring in biotite.
Each ring has its own characteristic radius in a given mineral in this case biotite. This radius measures the kinetic energy, hence the probability of emission of the corresponding a-particle and also the half-life of the parent nuclide according to the Geiger-Nuttall law. The Geiger-Nuttall law is an empirical relation between half-life of the a-emitter and the range in air of the emitted a-particles.
If the radii of these haloes from the same nuclide vary, this would imply that the decay rates have varied and would invalidate these series as being actual clocks. Are the radii in the rocks constant in size or are there variable sizes?
Most of the early studies of pleochroic haloes were made by Joly and Henderson. Joly concluded that the decay rates have varied on the basis of his finding a variation of the radii for rocks of alleged geological ages. This rather damaging result was explained away saying that enough evidence of correct radii for defferent geologic periods and sufficient variation in the same period have been obtained that one is forced to look for a different explanation of such variations as were observed by Joly.
Measurements were later made in an excellent collection of samples with haloes. It was found that the extent of the haloes around the inclusions varies over a wide range, even with the same nuclear material in the same matrix, but all sizes fall into definite groups. The measurements are, in microns, 5,7,10,17,20,23,27, and More recent studies have been made by Robert V. Gentry also finds a variation in the haloes leading him to conclude that the decay constants have not been constant in time.
Gentry points out an argument for an instantaneous creation of the earth. He noted form his studies of haloes: For the Po half-life of 3 minutes only a matter of minutes could elapse between the formation of the Po and subsequent crystallization of the mica; otherwise the Po would have decayed, and no ring would be visible.
The occurrence of these halo types is quite widespread, one or more types having been observed in the micas from Canada Pre-Cambrian , Sweden, and Japan. So, then, careful scientists have measured variations in halo radii and their measurements indicate a variation in decay rates.
The radioactive series then would have no value as time clocks. This would knock our C, potassium-argon, and uranium-lead dating measurements into a cocked hat! The age of prehistoric artifacts, the age of the earth, and that of the universe would be thrown into doubt. Flint, "Radiocarbon Dating," in Science, February 8, , p. This is significant because it is known that neutrinos do interact with the nucleii of atoms, and it is also believed that much of the energy of supernovae is carried away by neutrinos.
Isochrons Isochrons are an attempt to avoid the need for an absence of daughter element initially in computing radiometric ages. The idea is that one has a parent element, X, a daughter element, Y, and another isotope, Z, of the daughter that is not generated by decay. One would assume that initially, the concentration of Z and Y are proportional, since their chemical properties are very similar.
Radioactive decay would generate a concentration of Y proportional to X. So we would obtain an equation of the form. By taking enough measurements of the concentrations of X, Y, and Z, we can solve for c1 and c2, and from c1 we can determine the radiometric age of the sample.
If the concentration of K varies in a rock, that it is unlikely for the concentration of added argon 40 to vary in a way that will yield an isochron. But if the concentration of K does not vary, then one can still get an isochron if the concentration of the non-radiogenic isotope Ar36 of the daughter product varies.
So let's call an isochron a "super-isochron" if the concentration of the parent element varies from one sample to another. Let's call it a "wimpy isochron" otherwise. The question is, what percentage of isochrons are super-isochrons, and how do their dates agree with the conventional dates for their geologic period?
I would think that it may be rare to have a super-isochron. If one is dealing with minerals that exclude parent or daughter, then one cannot get an isochron at all. If one is dealing with minerals that do not exclude parent and daughter elements, then most likely the parent element will be evenly distributed everywhere, and one will have a wimpy isochron that cannot detect added daughter product, and thus may give unreliable ages.
Whole rock isochrons may also tend to be wimpy, for the same reason. Even super isochrons can yield ages that are too old, due to mixings, however. False K-Ar isochrons can be produced if a lava flow starts out with a lot of excess Ar40 which becomes well mixed, along with potassium. Then while cooling or afterwards, a mixture of Ar36 and Ar40 can enter the rock, more in some places than others. Other isotopes of argon would work as well. I believe that this will produce a good K-Ar isochron, but the age calculated will be meaningless.
There is another way that false isochrons can be produced. For a wimpy isochron, say a K-Ar isochron, we can assume that initially there is a uniform concentration of K everywhere, and concentrations of Ar40 and Ar36 that form an isochron. Then a lot of Ar40 enters, uniformly, through cracks in the rock or heating. This will retain the isochron property, but will make the isochron look too old.
My reasoning was that if the lava is thoroughly mixed, then the concentration of parent material should be fairly constant.
If the concentration of parent substance is not constant, it could indicate that the lava is not thoroughly mixed. Or it could have other explanations. If the lava is not thoroughly mixed, it is possible to obtain an isochron from the mixing of two different sources, in which case the radiometric age is inherited from the sources, and does not necessarily yield the age of the flow.
Someone pointed out to me that many Rb-Sr isochrons are super isochrons. I find this information very interesting, and thank him for it. I'd be curious to know which strata they occur in, as my main interest is the geologic column of Cambrian and above. My impression is that these are not on this part of the geologic column. And how well do the dates correlate with others for the same formation? There are also mixing scenarios that can produce even super isochrons having invalid ages.
And geologists admit in any event that isochrons can sometimes give false ages. Here is a mixing scenario for false isochrons. There are two sources of lava, A and B. Suppose these mix together so that at point 0 we have only A, at point 1 we have only B, and in between we have varying concentrations. Half way between there is a mixture of half A and half B, for example. Suppose X is a parent substance, Y is its daughter, and Z is a non-radiogenic isotope of the daughter.
Suppose A has a little X and lots of Y and not much Z, all uniformly distributed, and B has some mixture of Y and Z, all uniformly distributed. Then this varying mixture of A and B, with all A at 0 and all B at 1, produces a good isochron.
There is no way this mixture can be distinguished from a similar case in which A has lots of X and little Y, and B is the same as before, and a lot of time passes. It is claimed that mixing can often be detected. If this is so, then the question remains, for super isochrons on the geologic column which can be shown not to be caused by mixing, how do they correlate with other methods, and with the expected dates for their geologic period?
My understanding is that isochrons measure the time since a rock was last well mixed. For a lava flow, this could be the time of the flow.
Imsges: u-th dating of deep-sea corals
Climatic Change 13, no. Geochemical and Sr-Nd isotopic mapping of source provinces for the Mawson charnockites, east Antarctica:
Anomalies of methane in the atmosphere over the East Siberian Shelf: This implies a radiometric age of over 4 billion years.
Observations on the tectonic evolution of the southern Adelaide Fold Belt. Palaeontology 35, Evolution of the continental crust in when ex starts dating someone else Proterozoic Eastern Ghats Belt, India and new constraints for Rodinia reconstruction: Uranium decays to lead by a complex series of steps. The same goes for extrusive flows cirals the surface, since argon would be filtering up through the earth and through the lava as it cooled. Extrusive bodies are lava that is deposited on the surface. The composite magnetic anomaly map of the Ddeep-sea Antarctic, Tectonophysics,—
- Dating jokes
- Online dating seoul
- Online dating free look
- Best first message for dating sites
- Dating site for star signs
- Dating a libra man yahoo
- Speed dating torquay
- Best online dating profile for man
- Dating app apk download
- Intp dating intj
- Top 5 dating services
- How dating site make money
- Best opening line on dating site