Body language and speed dating

How to Host a Speed Dating Event

speed dating podcast

Or it could be heel to heel, it depends on what they were doing. How to Plan a Madrigal Dinner. Non-verbal communication went through, has gone through a variety of different phases. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.


The complexity of running an experiment where we have 15 film running simultaneously is just mind boggling to us… So scientists have started to create corpa individual: And to some extent that was probably true. The real issue is about engagement, rapport, and interactional synchrony. How to Organize a Basketball Tournament. I enjoy it immensely, sometimes I will do nothing but look at body language.

Give 'Em Something to Talk About -- Before the event, come up with a few discussion topics and questions to get conversations flowing. See our suggested questions on the next page! You can hand out a short list of questions to each guest or leave a few conversation starters on index cards at every table.

While you don't want participants to feel as though they're reading from a script, it can be helpful for daters to have a quick list to refer to if their nerves leave them tongue-tied. Sweat the Details -- Create spaces that are conducive to one-on-one conversations. Small bar tables or other two-person seating arrangements are ideal. Think about the logistics of moving speed daters from one conversation to the next. One possibility is to have the ladies stay put while gentlemen move up or down table numbers may make this go more smoothly.

Provide name tags for participants first name only or first name and last initial , as well as clipboards, pens and comment cards so that daters can keep track of the people they meet. Comment cards should provide space for participants to list the name of each new acquaintance along with an answer to the question, "Would you like to see this person again?

If and only if! Establish the Ground Rules -- Be sure participants know how long each conversation will be, what to do when the bell rings and what happens at the end of the speed dating session. If any questions or topics are off limits, be sure to say so.

In the original speed dating program started by Rabbi Deyo, participants are instructed to stay away from any variation of, "What do you do? Now that was the 70s, 80s and 90s. Starting in the late 90s and through to and onward, people started focusing on two things that have really broken through in body language. The first is that people have started accepting in the wild experiments. People have let go. Scientists have said, we still laboratory experiments but we also do this thing were we just put things out, have hidden cameras or what have you, and see what people do.

I would have thought that scientists would have been doing that for years before. Up until recently that would have been called anecdote, so scientists would have dismissed the results as being meaningless, and to some extent many psychologists will still do that. Multidisciplinary is say when a biochemist and a neuroscientist come together to understand a single molecule and how that influences the brain. But interdisciplinary is where you have say a neuroscientist, a historian and a dancer come together and try and come to some sort of reasonable conclusion.

The groups that are interested in body language now have completely different academic cultures. There are also lots of people from human computer interaction who are interested in effective computing, and those people have entered the field and they have completely different culture and interest.

Linguists are now entering the field as well, so they not only measure words, they measure non-verbal vocalisations, so the number of people who have gotten involved and from the different corners. We definitley are now using numerical techniques. Not only is it more interdisciplinary and in the wild, but we now have better sensors. So the psychologists made all of these measurements in the 60s and 70s by hand-scoaring films.

They were eyeballing things. We now have these sensors. We can instruct computers to detect things and then there is no interpretation, the computer does it itself. Are you worried about that? I certainly have a lot of fun with it. I enjoy it immensely, sometimes I will do nothing but look at body language.

Or when people have false smiles. And then I investigate them more. There are definitely differences between the ways that some people talk to one another and what their body language does and how they talk. They are talking but their bodies are not moving. Coming up the stairs to meet you here I was thinking, how is he going to interpret when I meet him and shake his hand and nod and say hello and smile and all those things.

Can you give me a bit more analysis now? In terms of your handshake, it was medium to soft. I would say that you come across as quite academic. But then there are other things. I wanted to ask you about politicians as well, and about body language there. David Cameron when he took office had what you would expect of someone who has quite a distant, possibly even arrogant body language. And to some extent that was probably true.

He was above it all, or trying to look above it all. It made his body language better than any of the other three parties. So interactional synchrony is the idea that when people get along they will be moving at about similar items, so one person will lean in and the other person will lean in, one person will move out and the other person will move out. If you like, I can show you a film. These sorts of movements seem to be associated with people who are getting along well.

Shall I show you one now? I used to have five or six that were out here. So these are two women who are very much in rapport. Lean back, lean forward, hands up, finger point, lean back, lean forward, eyes down, they lean forward, they both go eyes down, their hands go up and they stir at exactly the same time. Yes, a genuine conversation. I just told two people to get in a conversation They were making movements together in synchrony for about 26 seconds, once every two seconds, whilst having a conversation.

The question is does that have an influence? For the most part, people were dating, no one was freaked out by the headphones, by the microphones they were wearing, despite the fact that I thought it was bizarre.

And we had a full set of dates. The most recent set of data on speed dating was published by Dan Jurafsky at Stanford this year. Dan Jurafsky at Stanford, he has access to any amount of resources you can imagine. In South America, how are people different? You can read a transcript of this podcast and follow links to further information at podacademy. Or follow us on Twitter PodAcademy.

Harry Witchel on PubMed. Detecting friendly, flirtatious, awkward, and assertive speech in speed-dates. And maybe more interesting that the chosen media to broadcast this info is an audio podcast, was this a conscious decision? Thanks for the comment, Hannah. There was little grand design in my choice of medium or topic.

What do you think? Thanks to Harry Witchel, Adam and everyone else involved in making this podcast — absolutely fascinating. To what extent, I wonder, does this affect the quality and veracity of his analysis? Your email address will not be published.

Imsges: speed dating podcast

speed dating podcast

It looks like almost every speed dater is here.

speed dating podcast

That seems to make more sense. And to some extent that was probably true.

speed dating podcast

There was little grand design in my choice of medium or topic. They speed dating podcast eyeballing things. There were classic books in the s. With some of the work from Edward T. We now have these sensors.